Reframing User Segmentation for Surgical Robotics

We helped a surgical robotics organization rethink how it understood its users, replacing role-based assumptions with a segmentation model grounded in the behaviors, attitudes, and contexts that shaped adoption and use.

I led the engagement, guiding the project team while building the client trust and alignment needed to challenge established assumptions and move the organization toward a new way of thinking about its users.

The resulting model gave product and marketing teams a stronger foundation for deciding how to develop products and engage different user groups.

Project Info

Project Overview

Client: A Leading Manufacturer of Surgical Robotic Equipment

Time: 2021, 3 Months

Role: Project Lead, Strategist, Principal Investigator

Key Takeaways

Challenging the Original Segmentation Model

The client initially expected personas organized primarily around clinical roles such as surgeons and respiratory therapists.

Our work revealed that organizational context and experience were often equally, if not more, influential in shaping attitudes toward robotic technology.

Because stakeholders had been engaged throughout the process, we were able to challenge the original framing while maintaining trust in both the evidence and the direction.

Recognizing the Role of the Care Team

Looking beyond the primary physician user revealed how hospital staffing models could affect onboarding, mastery, equipment ownership, and attitudes toward troubleshooting.

Teams that worked together consistently developed different relationships with robotic technology than environments where staff rotated frequently between procedures.

This broadened the client’s perspective from individual users toward the organizational conditions shaping successful adoption.

Challenges

Balancing Evidence and Interpretation

Developing a useful segmentation model required maintaining traceability to the evidence while synthesizing individual experiences into patterns the organization could recognize and act on.

My role was to guide the team in deciding which differences were strategically meaningful, helping tell a clear story that maintained enough nuance and rich detail to effectively ground decisions.

Building Organizational Adoption

The model needed to be analytically credible but also simple enough to travel across the organization.

I worked with the client team to prioritize the information that mattered most and create a two-level format that provided a clear primary narrative with additional depth for teams that needed it. That balance helped the client socialize and apply the model after the engagement ended.